No, But I've Seen the Movie...
Thursday July 12, 2007
in films | books
Inspired by Booking Through Thursday. What’s the best translation of a book to a film? Or the worst?
Recently we were watching Brad Pitt in Troy. Apparently it’s loosely based on The Iliad, and I found it a very enjoyable film and much underrated – although I won’t claim to really know the ins and outs of Homer’s epic until I’ve actually read it.
Similarly, although I’ve watched all of the Lord of the Rings films, I’ll claim no knowledge of Tolkein’s trilogy until I’ve finally got round to reading the books. And I wanted to pass on Notes on a Scandal because I’ve read the book already, although – strapped into my seat on a flight recently – I had no choice but to endure this tedious film.
But what makes a good literary adaptation, and can something successfully jump from the page to the screen? Here follows a selection of what I think are good screen versions of classics – and yes – I’ve only chosen ones where I’ve read the book as well.
The Remains of the Day (1993)
I liked Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel so much I always thought it would never make a good film, but the Merchant-Ivory adaptation succeeds in enriching the book. Mostly for Anthony Hopkins, and although I’m not really a fan of the actor I think his interpretation of Stevens is masterful, subtle and moving.
Trivia: an earlier version of the film starring John Cleese had been planned and abandoned. Somewhere out there in an alternative universe is either a classic or an appallingly bad movie.
Oliver! (1968)
This might be controversial, but I think that Carol Reed’s screen adaptation of Lionel Bart’s musical version of Dickens’ novel is far superior to the much lauded David Lean film of Oliver Twist. When I was at college, one of the tutors gave an excellent lecture about the film, saying that although it took liberties with the book, it was essentially Dickensian. His point was that it captures the spirit and effortless charm of Dickens much more so than Lean’s rather worthy and dull film, and I agree.
Far From the Madding Crowd (1967)
I like John Schlesinger’s film, although it does now have a tendency to bark “look, it’s 1967!” at you. Darlings of the era Julie Christie and Terence Stamp are cast in the leads, and Stamp plays Sergeant Troy like he’s been paying too much attention to Sergeant Pepper. But it’s a very likeable film, and both Peter Finch and Alan Bates are excellent as Bathsheba’s other suitors. Compare and contrast with Polanski’s 1980 version of Tess, a film I’ve always found rather cold.
Our Mutual Friend (1998)
More Dickens. This is the BBC TV adaptation from a few years ago, which starred David Morrissey as the murderous schoolteacher Bradley Headstone. Rather good indeed. Unfortunately Mr Morrissey is now best known for the rather comical Basic Instinct 2.
The Trial (1962)
Orson Welles’ almost forgotten black and white film of Kafka’s classic, starring a very well cast Anthony Perkins as Joseph K.
The Time Machine (1960)
My introduction to H.G. Wells and science fiction. George Pal’s film adds a couple of charming touches to the original, such as the shop dummy opposite the time traveller’s house that appears to change its own costumes as the time machine races on. Rod Taylor is effective in the role, and even though the Morlocks don’t stand up to the test of time it’s still worth seeing.
1984 (1954)
This is the television adaptation of Orwell’s novel, scripted by Nigel Kneale and starring Peter Cushing and Donald Pleasence. It’s far superior to the better known John Hurt film.
Brighton Rock (1947)
Richard Attenborough stars as Pinkie Brown. I came to Graham Greene’s novel late, after seeing this film a few times. A great period piece.
And the worst? Fortunately they fade from memory, although I do get bored with the countless film and TV Jane Austen adaptations which all merge into one endless round of bonnets, Bath and banquets.
Taking up a Challenge
Wednesday July 11, 2007
in books |
It’s been a fair while since I’ve taken up a reading challenge. Perhaps this is because I am so hopeless at completing them. This was until I saw the Saturday Review Challenge at Semicolon, although I’m still not sure about my chances of finishing this…
If you don’t know about it, Semicolon’s Saturday Review of Books is an excellent weekly bloggy booky review fest. You are invited to post a link to a review you’ve written in the last week; it’s a great way to discover other blogs (as I’m lazy like this) and obviously a few new readers might come your way. It’s also interesting to find out what other people are writing about.
I noticed that The Literary Feline at Musings of a Bookish Kitty has already taken up the challenge, and is reading Cormac McCarthy’s The Road. Interesting, because along with The Tenderness of Wolves and The Book Thief (even The Thirteenth Tale, but that seems so long ago now) I think this is turning out to be one of the most discussed novels of the year so far. Purely my opinion of course; my review of The Tenderness of Wolves has caused some fantastic debate (27 comments and counting) and my review of The Road has received some generous praise from other bloggers, for which I’m very grateful.
The purpose of the challenge is to pick six novels already reviewed on the Saturday Review of Books in the last year, and to read and review them by December 31st. There’s a full list supplied by Sherry at Semicolon to make the task of choosing an easy one. My choices:
- Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll
- The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger (a reread)
- Love in the Time of Cholera by Gabriel Garcia Marquez
- Sense and Sensibility by Jane Austen
- The Five People You Meet in Heaven by Mitch Albom (okay, it’s his other book that’s on the list but I’m a cheat)
- Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys
So what are the chances of completing this one? Apart from the Jean Rhys, I own all of these titles and I’ve been meaning to reread Salinger for ages, and the Marquez and Austen I’ve been picking up and putting down edgily for some time. So it can’t be that hard, can it?
