The Book Tower
debut novel coming soon

RSS feed

Now's the Time

Friday June 13, 2008 in television | doctor who

When interviewed, Doctor Who supremos Russell T. Davies and Steven Moffat always say that they judge a good Doctor Who story by the reaction of children. In 1963, playgrounds were full of kids screaming “Ex-terminate!”. Ten years later, when I was a small child, the playgrounds were full of the less remembered but still absolutely terrifying Green Death, where my little gang played at escaping from giant, deadly Welsh maggots. Three years ago, when the series was revived, the sound of “Ex-terminate” echoing from a school playground as I strolled past brought a small tear to my eye. Since then, the playground has cowered to the cries of the Moffat-penned terrors “are you my mummy?”, “don’t blink” and now “hey, who turned out the lights?”.

Doctor Who

Moffat, who is about to replace Davies as head writer on Doctor Who, is writing some of the best television of recent years. I began to realise that the new Doctor Who was something quite special with the Moffat two-parter of series one The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances which introduced the “are you my mummy?” line. It also introduced Captain Jack Harkness, and the dark WWII-themed story suggested that Doctor Who could be much more than screaming metal monsters. Moffat followed this in the second series with The Girl in the Fireplace, an imaginitive story that nicely played on the woes of time travel, but the writer made his mark in series three with the BAFTA award winning Blink. The Doctor as a DVD extra, more time woes and capers and some very scary stone statues, Blink deserved all of its praise that has already made it classic tv.

Blink has given Steven Moffat a level of writerly fame, and his two-part story for series four was long-awaited. I was anxious about Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead as he’d raised the stakes so high. Luckily, I got the setting just right in order to calm my nerves. Strangely, for reasons beyond the boundaries of this post, I came to watch Silence in the Library with three children in a small … library. A perfect, eerie and uncannily – quiet – setting. Well written, brilliantly acted, odd, confusing, clever but most importantly scary, the episode had me transfixed along with my three small companions. I was even treated to a pre-playground frenzy on the Sunday morning, with cries of “hey, who turned out the lights?” and “now you be the monster!”

Forest of the Dead confirmed Moffat’s greatness for me. This was a beautiful, multi-layered episode, that has me thinking about the themes it had introduced on the next Sunday morning, where kids were still running around scaring eachother. David Tennant’s portrayal of The Doctor is really something special, and Catherine Tate, who I admit to having doubts over, is also impressive as Donna. What’s best about it is that Moffat et al are really trying hard to make this good; rather that producing a visually impressive yet simple programme, Doctor Who dares to challenge its own mythology and its own audience. And The Doctor certainly carries some mythology, the mysterious 900 year old who we’ve known since 1963 yet we don’t even know his name. Although that’s reserved for people really special…

Doctor Who. Certainly my favourite television since 2005, and possibly since The Green Death in 1973 too.

Yeah, I have to say I was impressed with this one too. In fact, like you, Moffat’s ones have tended to be my favourites in a particular series – actually, scrub that, never mind ‘have tended to be’ – they all have been.

Forest of the dead was fantastic on many levels: watching ‘Donna-as-mother’ try to hold on to her children sent shivers through me while my kids watched that bit without a flicker – but were much more freaked out by the ‘facial transcription errors’…

And that dawning ‘we are from here’ moment. Brilliant. Tennant has a wonderfully expressive face and excels in the role. I just keep wondering how long he’ll stay…

JackP    Friday June 13, 2008   

Yes “the face” was scary, especially so because the children I watched with could see it coming after all the veil business. And although “watching through the eyes of children” makes it all the more enjoyable you are right that there are things that go right over the top of their heads.

Whenever interviewed, DT is deliberately vague about how long he’ll stay in the role after the four specials next year. I think he should do at least one more full series, especially with Moffat in control.

The Book Tower    Friday June 13, 2008   

Can’t wait for the current series to hit Australia. Blink has been one of my favourite episodes so far. So clever and so absolutely terrifying.

jess    Saturday June 14, 2008   

…why assume that Tennant needs to complete a full series? The regenerations from Hartnell-Troughton and Davison-Baker didn’t occur at the very end of a series… it might add a little excitement if we knew that at some point in the series Doctor Who would regenerate… but we didn’t know when?

…but I’d like another series from Tennant too, as I think he’s excellent in the role and if he’s willing to put the time in, can overtake Tom Baker as the world’s official ‘favourite Doctor Who’!

JackP    Saturday June 14, 2008   

Jess: I’ll try not to post too many spoilers then!

Jack: this makes sense because I remember the changeover towards the end of a series could allow for at least one story or episode with the new actor. I guess this gave the writers time to go away and think about how he would portray the part, rather than writing a whole series without a clear idea. Perhaps this worked the same way with DT’s first appearance in the Christmas special a few years back.

On the other hand, I’m sure I remember a couple of Doctor personas being “planned” from the outset, for example the Colin Baker one was always supposed to be “dark” and “nasty” although I’d given up watching when he was doing it.

Whatever the outcome, I think they might be in trouble. Christopher Ecclestone didn’t do it for long enough to settle into the role, and DT came along at the right time – the right age, not significantly well known enough and a bloody good actor to boot. He’s had time to grow into the role and can go on growing quite a bit more. As long as he has time to do other projects (Shakespeare, comedy, he was in that film on tv where he’s gone mad) I think he’ll stay for the time being, but his eventual replacement is going to have a tough act to follow.

The Book Tower    Saturday June 14, 2008   

your_ip_is_blacklisted_by sbl.spamhaus.org